Home
Draft
Draft War RoomDraft SyncPreseason RankingsMock DraftRookie BoardHandcuff FinderStrength of ScheduleBye PlannerCheat SheetValues & ReachesScarcity CurveStack Finder
In-Season
Weekly ProjectionsSeason Budget PaceWaiver WireNova NuggetsInjury WatchScenariosLineup OptimizerTrendingScores
Tools
CompareTrade AnalyzerWhat-IfMy LeagueConnect LeagueTrade FinderTeamsRoster Report CardExport
Research
Divergence WatchLine MoversSignal LibraryArmchair QBAsk NovaFloor / CeilingOpportunityConsistency
BlogNewsletterPricing
About
About NovaPredictMethodologyAccountabilityChallenge the ModelLeaderboard
Login

← back to rankings

Caleb Williams

Caleb Williams

QBCHI· bye 10· Nova #70 · T7DNA V
10.4
VORP
86.6
ADP
18.86
PPR / game
The verdict

Nova has Caleb Williams, 70th overall, QB, CHI, Tier 7, 10.4 VORP, 309.3 projected PPR points, 18.9 PPR points per game. Current PPR ADP is 86.6, so Nova is ahead of the room on price. The modeled PPR range runs from 100 to 454 points.

By Chris Hanna · updated Jul 11, 2026

Editorial preseason rankings are shown separately from directional model projections, VORP, and tiers.

Rankings updated September 7. The analysis below is under review after the ranking-model correction. Its older finish probabilities and draft recommendations are not current. Use the updatedrankings board for draft decisions.

Where He's Expected to Land

Nova's median sim gives Williams 296 season points at 17.91 per game across 16.5 expected games, on a projected stat line of 3,835 passing yards, 24.6 passing TDs, 421 rushing yards, and 2 rushing scores. The likely finish range is QB6–QB27, deliberately wide, because his DNA grade is V (Variable) and the model refuses to pretend otherwise.

Note what the median does: it prices in mild regression from his 2025 total (318.2 fantasy points) while still clearing his draft cost by a mile. Nova gives him a 47% shot at a tier-2-or-better QB season and a 28% shot at tier-1.

The Last Three Seasons

Year Team Games FPts / PPG Finish
2024 CHI 17 254.5 / 15.0 QB16
2025 CHI 17 318.2 / 18.7 QB5

(Only two NFL seasons exist, he was the No. 1 overall pick in 2024 out of USC, so the three-year lookback is two years deep by definition.)

The rookie year table row hides the context: 68 sacks behind a broken line, three play-callers, a 5-12 team. In 2025 the sack total fell from 68 to 24, the TD:INT ratio jumped to 27:7 (3,942 yards), and the Bears went 11-6, won the NFC North, and got their first playoff win since 2010. Two seasons, 34 starts, zero games missed to injury, durability is not the discount here.

What Changed for Him This Offseason

Almost nothing, and for once that's the headline. No new team, no new scheme, no surgery, no contract drama. Williams, 24, enters Year 2 in the same Ben Johnson offense for the first continuity of his NFL career, after learning a new system in each of his first two seasons. The one real flaw carried forward: a 58.1% completion rate that ranked near the bottom of the league's starters, per Patrick Finley of the Chicago Sun-Times (July 9), and Johnson has made completion percentage the stated offseason priority.

What Changed Around Him

Coaching: Full stability. Johnson returns for Year 2 as head coach and play-caller, and second-year offenses in his scheme are the entire bull case, the install is done, the audible menu is his.

The pass-catchers turned over. Chicago traded DJ Moore to Buffalo for a second-round pick (per Mike Moraitis, Bears On SI, July 4), handing the alpha job to Rome Odunze, who's coming off a stress fracture that limited him to 44 catches, and second-year slot Luther Burden, who produced nearly 40% of his receiving yards in the final four games of 2025. Tight end Colston Loveland ranked top-5 at the position in catches, yards, and TDs from Week 9 on, per Finley. Kalif Raymond and Scotty Miller add depth, not target competition.

The line lost its center. Drew Dalman retired; the Bears traded for Garrett Bradbury and drafted Logan Jones to replace him. Joe Thuney (the NFL's inaugural Protector of the Year) anchors the interior, and right tackle Darnell Wright wants an extension before Week 1. Williams was pressured on 24.2% of dropbacks last year, the center swap is the quiet risk in an otherwise stable protection picture.

What They're Saying

"It's a hell of a lot more fun for me than it was last year," Williams said at June OTAs, per Pro Football Talk (June 14). On Year 1, he told reporters the same day: "I feel like I was drowning, trying to breathe or stay alive and wait for a boat to come around last year." He's openly said this offense can lead the league in scoring.

Johnson, for his part, framed Williams' next step as leadership and efficiency, not arm talent, telling reporters on June 9 that winning Super Bowls is Williams' motivating factor, per Kole Noble of A to Z Sports (June 15). Camp observers describe the offense as visibly further along than last June.

Does Nova price the leap in? Partially. The model projects a near-repeat of 2025's volume with slightly fewer TDs, it is not projecting the top-scoring-offense outcome. That outcome lives in the right tail, and the tail is fat: a 522-point ceiling.

The Buzz

Fantasy media is openly calling him mispriced: Da Windy City's Nick Halden (July 1) argues he's "massively undervalued" at a QB9 price, and SI's fantasy desk (Matt Brandon and Mark Morales-Smith, July 2) notes he's already jumped Jalen Hurts and goes as QB6 in high-stakes rooms. So the sharp money has moved; home-league ADP (108 overall, round 10 in 12-team formats per Fantasy Football Calculator) hasn't caught up. Nova sides with the sharps, the crowd chatter is ahead of the price, not ahead of the model.

Swing Factors

  • Completion percentage (±60 pts): 58.1% is the single biggest lever between the 296 median and the 522-point ceiling. Johnson has made it the offseason project; the flag is planted.
  • Rushing usage (±30 pts): 4.5 carries per game at 5.0 YPC last year, but only 3 rushing TDs on 21 red-zone opportunities. A designed-run bump is the cheapest path to boom weeks.
  • Odunze's foot (−25 pts): if the stress fracture lingers, the post-Moore target tree thins fast.
  • Center transition (−20 pts): Bradbury/Jones replacing Dalman against a 24.2% pressure rate.
  • TD regression already priced (+0): Nova projects 24.6 passing TDs vs. last year's 27, the model took the haircut for you.

If Everything Goes Right / If Everything Goes Wrong

If everything goes right: the completion rate climbs into the mid-60s, Burden's December becomes his baseline, Loveland turns the middle of the field into a layup line, and the offense Williams committed shows up. That's the sim's 90th-percentile territory, a 522-point ceiling, top-of-position stuff. Nova prices the tier-1 season at 28%.

If everything goes wrong: the accuracy never comes, Odunze's foot and a new center shrink the passing game, and a Variable-DNA quarterback with a 15% weekly bust rate becomes unstartable by October. The floor of the distribution sits at 103 points. The weekly math still leans your way, 40% boom weeks against 15% busts, but V-grade means you will feel both numbers.

Nova's Edge

The edge is the price, and it's threefold. First, divergence: Nova rank 70 vs. ADP 86.6 is one of the widest QB gaps on the board, the room is drafting a proven QB5-in-PPG like a backup. Second, distribution: a 40% boom rate at pick 106 is a ratio the players drafted around him can't touch; you're buying starter-week frequency at streamer cost. Third, the market split itself: high-stakes drafters pay QB6 while home leagues pay QB9-10, when the sharpest room and the model agree against the casual price, take the casual price. One caveat we'll own: Nova's page shows early SOS 12.8 and playoff SOS 13.3, but the scale's direction isn't documented on the product yet, so we're not spinning those numbers either way.

The Bottom Line

At his current ADP (round 9–10 of 12-team leagues), Williams is a buy, take him as the back end of a late-round QB pairing or as your QB1 if you spent the first eight rounds on skill players. He's fairly priced, not a value, if your room follows the high-stakes trend into rounds 6–7; don't chase him past pick 75 in 1QB formats. In superflex he's a locked-in top-15 pick given two years of perfect health and a 47% tier-2+ probability. Stack note: Odunze comes cheap enough to pair. The gradeable claim: Williams finishes top-8 at quarterback, Nova's 47% tier-2+ number against a QB9-10 price, and we'll grade it in January, miss included if we're wrong.

Sources (12)
Read next
Nova overview

Caleb Williams is Nova's 70th-ranked player overall (QB, CHI), in Tier 7. Nova projects roughly 309 points this season, about 18.86 per game.

He is a value: the market drafts him around pick 87, well behind Nova's 70, so he tends to return more than his cost.

His week-to-week profile grades V (Variable). His fantasy-playoff schedule (weeks 15-17) looks average.

Usage & opportunity2025 · 17 games
Snap share99%
Target share0%
Carry share16%
Air-yards share-0%
Catch rate100%
WOPR (opportunity)0.005
12.8
Early SOS (wk 1-4)
13.3
Playoff SOS (wk 15-17)
10
Bye week
Season budget pace
full board →
+17%Ahead
84.3 of 296.4 banked · 4wrevised 321.8

+17% ahead of pace, some regression likely.

Per-game points distribution
5% @ 19 pts0132639 pts
13%
Bust <10 pts
43%
Solid 10–20 pts
44%
Boom >20 pts

Not one number. The probability of every weekly outcome, from the player’s real week-to-week range across 34 games.

Season outcome range
floor 100 ptmed 309 ptceil 454 pt
n/a
P(tier-1)
Report card
Opportunity · snaps99%
Rank edge vs market+17

Nova rank by format

FormatNova RankTierVORPP(Tier-1)Finish rangeTotal P10-P90
PPR70 (QB7)T710.4n/an/a99.8-453.6
Half PPR69 (QB7)T79.9n/an/a99.6-452.7
Standard65 (QB7)T89.5n/an/a99.4-451.9
2QB / Superflex18 (QB7)T588.6n/an/a99.8-453.6

Nova season stat lines16.4 expected games

StatNova projection
Rushing Yards422.2
Rushing TDs1.9
Passing Yards3798
Passing TDs24.4

2025 usage profile17 games

99%
snap share
4.5
carries / game
16%
team carry share
5
yards / carry
+7.6
TD pace vs position (31 total)

PFR advanced (2025)Pro-Football-Reference, regular season

5
broken tackles forced
19.1
rush yards before contact / g
3.5
rush yards after contact / g
0
drops
0%
drop rate
152.1
passer rating when targeted
151
times pressured
24.2%
pressure rate faced
164
times blitzed
24
times sacked
90
times hurried
37
times hit
19.1%
bad throw rate

Tracked market season lines vs Novaseason betting market vs Nova’s projection

StatDK lineMarket leanNovaΔ%
Passing TDs24.550% over24.4-0.4%
Passing Yards3649.552% over3798+4.1%

2025 game logregular season, nflverse weekly stats

WeekOppStat linePPR
W1CHI vs MIN210-1-0 pass, 6-58-1 rush24.2
W2CHI vs DET207-2-1 pass, 5-27-0 rush17.0
W3CHI vs DAL298-4-0 pass, 5-12-0 rush29.1
W4CHI vs LV212-1-1 pass, 8-13-0 rush11.8
W6CHI vs WAS252-1-0 pass, 4--2-1 rush19.9
W7CHI vs NO172-0-1 pass, 4--2-0 rush4.7
W8CHI vs BAL285-0-1 pass, 3-24-0 rush11.8
W9CHI vs CIN280-3-0 pass, 5-53-0 rush38.7
W10CHI vs NYG220-1-0 pass, 8-63-1 rush25.1
W11CHI vs MIN193-0-0 pass, 4-26-0 rush10.3
W12CHI vs PIT239-3-0 pass, 4-21-0 rush21.7
W13CHI vs PHI154-1-1 pass, 5-13-0 rush9.5
W14CHI vs GB186-2-1 pass, 4-15-0 rush14.9
W15CHI vs CLE242-2-0 pass, 3-13-0 rush19.0
W16CHI vs GB250-2-0 pass, 3-30-0 rush21.0
W17CHI vs SF330-2-0 pass, 5-18-0 rush23.0
W18CHI vs DET212-2-1 pass, 1-1-0 rush16.6
AI fantasy football questions for Caleb Williams

These answers are generated from the same NovaPredict player page data: Nova Rank, VORP, ADP, probability bands, team context, usage, schedule, and tracked market coverage where available.

What is the AI fantasy football prediction for Caleb Williams in 2026?

Nova ranks him No. 70 overall in Tier 7 with a 309-point season budget (18.86 PPR points per game) for the Chicago Bears. Full probability bands are not available for this player in the current data run. His bye is Week 10.

Is Caleb Williams undervalued or overvalued by AI rankings?

Current PPR ADP is 86.6, around pick 8.03. Nova is higher than the draft room by about 17 picks.

What does NovaPredict project for Caleb Williams in PPR leagues?

Nova's PPR view for Caleb Williams is 309 season points at 18.86 points per game. His PPR VORP is 10.4, which is the value Nova sees above replacement at QB.

How risky is Caleb Williams based on AI probability bands and DNA grade?

His DNA grade is V, based on 34 logged games, so the AI view treats his week-to-week volatility as variable. Full probability bands are not available for this player in the current data run.

Should I draft Caleb Williams at current ADP?

At ADP 86.6, Caleb Williams is priced as a QB on the Chicago Bears. Nova is higher than the draft room by about 17 picks. Schedule context: early SOS is 12.8 and playoff SOS is 13.3 on Nova's 1-32 scale.

What team context affects Caleb Williams's 2026 fantasy outlook?

Caleb Williams is listed with the Chicago Bears as a QB. The 2025 usage profile includes 17 games and a 99% snap share, plus a 0% target share and a 16% carry share. Team context matters because nearby Chicago Bears fantasy pieces on this board include Cole Kmet, Colston Loveland, D'Andre Swift.

What market or injury context should I know for Caleb Williams?

Tracked market lines are loaded for 2 season stats, so Nova can compare its stat projection against the market. Profile note: Nova has Caleb Williams, 70th overall, QB, CHI, Tier 7, 10.4 VORP, 309.3 projected PPR points, 18.9 PPR points per game.