Caleb Williams
Nova has Caleb Williams 42nd overall with 37.8 VORP, and the market is letting him sit until pick 106.3. The player page publishes the rank edge vs. market as +72 (the raw rank-vs-ADP gap works out to +64; we report both as published). Either way, the direction is unambiguous: this is one of the largest QB values on Nova's 2026 board.
Where He's Expected to Land
Nova's median sim gives Williams 296 season points at 17.91 per game across 16.5 expected games, on a projected stat line of 3,835 passing yards, 24.6 passing TDs, 421 rushing yards, and 2 rushing scores. The likely finish range is QB6–QB27, deliberately wide, because his DNA grade is V (Variable) and the model refuses to pretend otherwise.
Note what the median does: it prices in mild regression from his 2025 total (318.2 fantasy points) while still clearing his draft cost by a mile. Nova gives him a 47% shot at a tier-2-or-better QB season and a 28% shot at tier-1.
The Last Three Seasons
| Year | Team | Games | FPts / PPG | Finish |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CHI | 17 | 254.5 / 15.0 | QB16 |
| 2025 | CHI | 17 | 318.2 / 18.7 | QB5 |
(Only two NFL seasons exist, he was the No. 1 overall pick in 2024 out of USC, so the three-year lookback is two years deep by definition.)
The rookie year table row hides the context: 68 sacks behind a broken line, three play-callers, a 5-12 team. In 2025 the sack total fell from 68 to 24, the TD:INT ratio jumped to 27:7 (3,942 yards), and the Bears went 11-6, won the NFC North, and got their first playoff win since 2010. Two seasons, 34 starts, zero games missed to injury, durability is not the discount here.
What Changed for Him This Offseason
Almost nothing, and for once that's the headline. No new team, no new scheme, no surgery, no contract drama. Williams, 24, enters Year 2 in the same Ben Johnson offense for the first continuity of his NFL career, after learning a new system in each of his first two seasons. The one real flaw carried forward: a 58.1% completion rate that ranked near the bottom of the league's starters, per Patrick Finley of the Chicago Sun-Times (July 9), and Johnson has made completion percentage the stated offseason priority.
What Changed Around Him
Coaching: Full stability. Johnson returns for Year 2 as head coach and play-caller, and second-year offenses in his scheme are the entire bull case, the install is done, the audible menu is his.
The pass-catchers turned over. Chicago traded DJ Moore to Buffalo for a second-round pick (per Mike Moraitis, Bears On SI, July 4), handing the alpha job to Rome Odunze, who's coming off a stress fracture that limited him to 44 catches, and second-year slot Luther Burden, who produced nearly 40% of his receiving yards in the final four games of 2025. Tight end Colston Loveland ranked top-5 at the position in catches, yards, and TDs from Week 9 on, per Finley. Kalif Raymond and Scotty Miller add depth, not target competition.
The line lost its center. Drew Dalman retired; the Bears traded for Garrett Bradbury and drafted Logan Jones to replace him. Joe Thuney (the NFL's inaugural Protector of the Year) anchors the interior, and right tackle Darnell Wright wants an extension before Week 1. Williams was pressured on 24.2% of dropbacks last year, the center swap is the quiet risk in an otherwise stable protection picture.
What They're Saying
"It's a hell of a lot more fun for me than it was last year," Williams said at June OTAs, per Pro Football Talk (June 14). On Year 1, he told reporters the same day: "I feel like I was drowning, trying to breathe or stay alive and wait for a boat to come around last year." He's openly said this offense can lead the league in scoring.
Johnson, for his part, framed Williams' next step as leadership and efficiency, not arm talent, telling reporters on June 9 that winning Super Bowls is Williams' motivating factor, per Kole Noble of A to Z Sports (June 15). Camp observers describe the offense as visibly further along than last June.
Does Nova price the leap in? Partially. The model projects a near-repeat of 2025's volume with slightly fewer TDs, it is not projecting the top-scoring-offense outcome. That outcome lives in the right tail, and the tail is fat: a 522-point ceiling.
The Buzz
Fantasy media is openly calling him mispriced: Da Windy City's Nick Halden (July 1) argues he's "massively undervalued" at a QB9 price, and SI's fantasy desk (Matt Brandon and Mark Morales-Smith, July 2) notes he's already jumped Jalen Hurts and goes as QB6 in high-stakes rooms. So the sharp money has moved; home-league ADP (108 overall, round 10 in 12-team formats per Fantasy Football Calculator) hasn't caught up. Nova sides with the sharps, the crowd chatter is ahead of the price, not ahead of the model.
Swing Factors
- Completion percentage (±60 pts): 58.1% is the single biggest lever between the 296 median and the 522-point ceiling. Johnson has made it the offseason project; the flag is planted.
- Rushing usage (±30 pts): 4.5 carries per game at 5.0 YPC last year, but only 3 rushing TDs on 21 red-zone opportunities. A designed-run bump is the cheapest path to boom weeks.
- Odunze's foot (−25 pts): if the stress fracture lingers, the post-Moore target tree thins fast.
- Center transition (−20 pts): Bradbury/Jones replacing Dalman against a 24.2% pressure rate.
- TD regression already priced (+0): Nova projects 24.6 passing TDs vs. last year's 27, the model took the haircut for you.
If Everything Goes Right / If Everything Goes Wrong
If everything goes right: the completion rate climbs into the mid-60s, Burden's December becomes his baseline, Loveland turns the middle of the field into a layup line, and the offense Williams promised shows up. That's the sim's 90th-percentile territory, a 522-point ceiling, top-of-position stuff. Nova prices the tier-1 season at 28%.
If everything goes wrong: the accuracy never comes, Odunze's foot and a new center shrink the passing game, and a Variable-DNA quarterback with a 15% weekly bust rate becomes unstartable by October. The floor of the distribution sits at 103 points. The weekly math still leans your way, 40% boom weeks against 15% busts, but V-grade means you will feel both numbers.
Nova's Edge
The edge is the price, and it's threefold. First, divergence: Nova rank 42 vs. ADP 106.3 is one of the widest QB gaps on the board, the room is drafting a proven QB5-in-PPG like a backup. Second, distribution: a 40% boom rate at pick 106 is a ratio the players drafted around him can't touch; you're buying starter-week frequency at streamer cost. Third, the market split itself: high-stakes drafters pay QB6 while home leagues pay QB9-10, when the sharpest room and the model agree against the casual price, take the casual price. One caveat we'll own: Nova's page shows early SOS 12.8 and playoff SOS 13.3, but the scale's direction isn't documented on the product yet, so we're not spinning those numbers either way.
The Bottom Line
At his current ADP (round 9–10 of 12-team leagues), Williams is a buy, take him as the back end of a late-round QB pairing or as your QB1 if you spent the first eight rounds on skill players. He's fairly priced, not a value, if your room follows the high-stakes trend into rounds 6–7; don't chase him past pick 75 in 1QB formats. In superflex he's a locked-in top-15 pick given two years of perfect health and a 47% tier-2+ probability. Stack note: Odunze comes cheap enough to pair. The gradeable claim: Williams finishes top-8 at quarterback, Nova's 47% tier-2+ number against a QB9-10 price, and we'll grade it in January, miss included if we're wrong.
Sources (12)
- https://novapredict.com/players/caleb-williams-qb
- https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WillCa03.htm
- https://fantasydata.com/nfl/caleb-williams-fantasy/24927
- https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/07/22/caleb-williams-fantasy-outlook-expect-a-qb1-finish/
- https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/caleb-williams-says-its-a-hell-of-a-lot-more-fun-in-year-2-in-ben-johnsons-offense
- https://atozsports.com/nfl/chicago-bears-news/bears-caleb-williams-ben-johnson-relationship-chicago-offense-training-camp/
- https://www.si.com/nfl/bears/onsi/chicago-bears-best-moves-of-the-2026-nfl-offseason
- https://www.newsweek.com/sports/nfl/chicago-bears-2026-training-camp-preview-its-all-about-caleb-williams-12001444
- https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/07/09/bears-position-group-ranking-tight-end-defensive-line-ben-johnson-caleb-williams-colston-loveland-nfl
- https://www.si.com/onsi/fantasy/nfl/caleb-williamsfantasy-football-sleeper-2026
- https://dawindycity.com/caleb-williams-is-being-massively-undervalued-in-2026-fantasy-football-drafts
- https://fantasyfootballcalculator.com/players/caleb-williams
Caleb Williams is Nova's 72nd-ranked player overall (QB, CHI), in Tier 7. Nova projects roughly 295 points this season, about 18.02 per game.
He is a value: the market drafts him around pick 109, well behind Nova's 72, so he tends to return more than his cost.
Nova gives him about a 27% shot at a tier-1 season, with simulated outcomes from roughly 97 points (floor) to 484 (ceiling). His week-to-week profile grades V (Variable). His fantasy-playoff schedule (weeks 15-17) looks average.
+17% ahead of pace, some regression likely.
Not one number. The probability of every weekly outcome, from the player’s real week-to-week range across 34 games.
Nova rank by format
| Format | Nova Rank | Tier | VORP | P(Tier-1) | Finish range | Total P10-P90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPR | 72 | T7 | 13.8 | 27% | QB6-QB27 | 97.2-483.6 |
| Half PPR | 70 | T8 | 13.4 | 27% | QB6-QB27 | 97-482.7 |
| Standard | 69 | T9 | 16.1 | 27% | QB6-QB27 | 96.8-481.8 |
| 2QB / Superflex | 42 | T7 | 44.8 | 27% | QB6-QB27 | 97.2-483.6 |
Nova season stat lines16.5 expected games
| Stat | Nova projection |
|---|---|
| Receptions | 1.2 |
| Rushing Yards | 420.8 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Passing Yards | 3834.7 |
| Passing TDs | 24.6 |
2025 usage profile17 games
PFR advanced (2025)Pro-Football-Reference, regular season
No season futures captured for this player yet. The market board rotates and coverage grows Mon/Wed/Fri.
2025 game logregular season, nflverse weekly stats
| Week | Opp | Stat line | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | CHI vs MIN | 210-1-0 pass, 6-58-1 rush | 24.2 |
| W2 | CHI vs DET | 207-2-1 pass, 5-27-0 rush | 17.0 |
| W3 | CHI vs DAL | 298-4-0 pass, 5-12-0 rush | 29.1 |
| W4 | CHI vs LV | 212-1-1 pass, 8-13-0 rush | 11.8 |
| W6 | CHI vs WAS | 252-1-0 pass, 4--2-1 rush | 19.9 |
| W7 | CHI vs NO | 172-0-1 pass, 4--2-0 rush | 4.7 |
| W8 | CHI vs BAL | 285-0-1 pass, 3-24-0 rush | 11.8 |
| W9 | CHI vs CIN | 280-3-0 pass, 5-53-0 rush | 38.7 |
| W10 | CHI vs NYG | 220-1-0 pass, 8-63-1 rush | 25.1 |
| W11 | CHI vs MIN | 193-0-0 pass, 4-26-0 rush | 10.3 |
| W12 | CHI vs PIT | 239-3-0 pass, 4-21-0 rush | 21.7 |
| W13 | CHI vs PHI | 154-1-1 pass, 5-13-0 rush | 9.5 |
| W14 | CHI vs GB | 186-2-1 pass, 4-15-0 rush | 14.9 |
| W15 | CHI vs CLE | 242-2-0 pass, 3-13-0 rush | 19.0 |
| W16 | CHI vs GB | 250-2-0 pass, 3-30-0 rush | 21.0 |
| W17 | CHI vs SF | 330-2-0 pass, 5-18-0 rush | 23.0 |
| W18 | CHI vs DET | 212-2-1 pass, 1-1-0 rush | 16.6 |
